Michelle Riddick v. Kaiser Permanente

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999926449-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00046-HEH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999948240]. [16-1917]

Appeal: 16-1917

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/17/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1917

MICHELLE RIDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAISER PERMANENTE,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:16-cv-00046-HEH)

Submitted:

October 13, 2016

Decided:

October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1917

Doc: 9

Filed: 10/17/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Michelle

Riddick

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice for failure to
effectuate service.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

On appeal, we

confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

Because Riddick’s informal brief does not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Riddick
has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.

See Williams

v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2