Erika Rivera-Solorzano v. Loretta Lynch

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-082-193. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000046881].. [16-1924]

Appeal: 16-1924

Doc: 28

Filed: 03/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1924

ERIKA GRISELDA RIVERA-SOLORZANO,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

February 16, 2017

Decided:

March 22, 2017

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron R. Caruso, ABOD & CARUSO, LLC, Wheaton, Maryland, for
Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney
General,
Anthony
C.
Payne,
Assistant
Director,
Alexander J. Lutz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1924

Doc: 28

Filed: 03/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Erika Griselda Rivera-Solorzano, a native and citizen of El
Salvador,

petitions

Immigration

Appeals

immigration

removal,

the

all

We

evidence

does

not

an

order

of

her

her

of

the

requests
under

have

thoroughly

reviewed

Rivera-Solorzano’s

evidence.
compel

a

We
ruling

conclude
contrary

from

for

protection

of

Board

appeal

and

transcript

supporting

of

dismissing

denial

Torture. *

including
and

of

review

(Board)

judge’s

withholding
Against

for

the

of
the

asylum,

Convention

the

record,

merits

hearing

that
to

the
any

record
of

the

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2012),

and

decision.

that

substantial

evidence

we

deny

the

petition

reasons stated by the Board.
July 18, 2016).
and

the

Board’s

See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

Accordingly,

facts

supports

legal

for

review

for

the

In re Rivera-Solorzano (B.I.A.

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

*

adequately

presented

in

the

Rivera-Solorzano does not raise any challenges to the
agency’s denial of her request for protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We would lack jurisdiction over any
such claims on the ground that she failed to exhaust her
administrative remedies before the Board.
See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(d)(1) (2012); Massis v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 631, 638–40
(4th Cir. 2008).

2

Appeal: 16-1924

Doc: 28

materials

before

Filed: 03/22/2017

this

court

Pg: 3 of 3

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

3