Erika Rivera-Solorzano v. Loretta Lynch
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A205-082-193. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000046881].. [16-1924]
Appeal: 16-1924
Doc: 28
Filed: 03/22/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1924
ERIKA GRISELDA RIVERA-SOLORZANO,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Decided:
March 22, 2017
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron R. Caruso, ABOD & CARUSO, LLC, Wheaton, Maryland, for
Petitioner.
Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant
Attorney
General,
Anthony
C.
Payne,
Assistant
Director,
Alexander J. Lutz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1924
Doc: 28
Filed: 03/22/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Erika Griselda Rivera-Solorzano, a native and citizen of El
Salvador,
petitions
Immigration
Appeals
immigration
removal,
the
all
We
evidence
does
not
an
order
of
her
her
of
the
requests
under
have
thoroughly
reviewed
Rivera-Solorzano’s
evidence.
compel
a
We
ruling
conclude
contrary
from
for
protection
of
Board
appeal
and
transcript
supporting
of
dismissing
denial
Torture. *
including
and
of
review
(Board)
judge’s
withholding
Against
for
the
of
the
asylum,
Convention
the
record,
merits
hearing
that
to
the
any
record
of
the
administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)
(2012),
and
decision.
that
substantial
evidence
we
deny
the
petition
reasons stated by the Board.
July 18, 2016).
and
the
Board’s
See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly,
facts
supports
legal
for
review
for
the
In re Rivera-Solorzano (B.I.A.
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
*
adequately
presented
in
the
Rivera-Solorzano does not raise any challenges to the
agency’s denial of her request for protection under the
Convention Against Torture. We would lack jurisdiction over any
such claims on the ground that she failed to exhaust her
administrative remedies before the Board.
See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252(d)(1) (2012); Massis v. Mukasey, 549 F.3d 631, 638–40
(4th Cir. 2008).
2
Appeal: 16-1924
Doc: 28
materials
before
Filed: 03/22/2017
this
court
Pg: 3 of 3
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?