Clotilde Jimenez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999917835-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Clotilde C. Jimenez. [16-1926]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CLOTILDE C. JIMENEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC.;
SHAPIRO & BROWN, LLP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00624-CMH-MSN)
January 10, 2017
March 9, 2017
Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clotilde C. Jimenez, Appellant Pro Se.
Barnwell, Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, Nathan Ira Brown,
NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Huntington, West
Virginia, Sarah Reimers McIntee, NELSON MULLINS RILEY &
SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
(E.D. Va. filed July 26, 2016; entered July 27, 2016).
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?