Nicole Winston v. Air Force Review Boards Agency

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999916010-2] Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01796-PJM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976717]. Mailed to: N. Winston. [16-1941]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1941 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1941 NICOLE YVETTE WINSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AIR FORCE REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-01796-PJM) Submitted: November 22, 2016 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. THACKER, Circuit Decided: Judges, November 29, 2016 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicole Yvette Winston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1941 Doc: 10 Filed: 11/29/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Nicole Yvette Winston appeals the district court’s order denying her motions for reconsideration and for discovery. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Winston v. Air Force Review Bds. Agency, No. 8:16-cv- 01796-PJM (D. Md. July 27, 2016). We deny Winston’s motion for transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?