Nicole Winston v. Air Force Review Boards Agency
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999916010-2] Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01796-PJM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999976717]. Mailed to: N. Winston. [16-1941]
Appeal: 16-1941
Doc: 10
Filed: 11/29/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1941
NICOLE YVETTE WINSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AIR FORCE REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:16-cv-01796-PJM)
Submitted:
November 22, 2016
Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.
THACKER,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
November 29, 2016
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicole Yvette Winston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1941
Doc: 10
Filed: 11/29/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Nicole Yvette Winston appeals the district court’s order
denying her motions for reconsideration and for discovery.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Winston v. Air Force Review Bds. Agency, No. 8:16-cv-
01796-PJM (D. Md. July 27, 2016).
We deny Winston’s motion for
transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?