Jerome Want v. Steven Frei

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00660-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999971924]. Mailed to: Jerome Want. [16-1955]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1955 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1955 JEROME WANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEVEN MARK FREI, Attorney; SICKLES, FREI & MIMS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00660-LMB-IDD) Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome Want, Appellant Pro Se. John A. C. Keith, Laurie Kirkland, BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1955 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/21/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jerome Want seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion to recuse the district court judge assigned to his case, his motion to appoint counsel, and his motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). orders nor The orders Want seeks to appeal are neither final appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?