Jerome Want v. Steven Frei
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00660-LMB-IDD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [999971924]. Mailed to: Jerome Want. [16-1955]
Appeal: 16-1955
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1955
JEROME WANT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEVEN MARK FREI, Attorney; SICKLES, FREI & MIMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (1:16-cv-00660-LMB-IDD)
Submitted:
November 17, 2016
Decided:
November 21, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Want, Appellant Pro Se. John A. C. Keith, Laurie Kirkland,
BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1955
Doc: 11
Filed: 11/21/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Want seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion to recuse the district court judge assigned to
his case, his motion to appoint counsel, and his motion for
reconsideration.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
orders
nor
The orders Want seeks to appeal are neither final
appealable
interlocutory
or
collateral
orders.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?