Terry of the Family Parks v. The Commonwealth of Virginia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999928442-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999995562]. Mailed to: Crawford, McDaniel, Parks, Weber. [16-1956]
Appeal: 16-1956
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/30/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1956
TERRY OF THE FAMILY PARKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB)
Submitted:
December 13, 2016
Decided:
December 30, 2016
Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Parks, Appellant Pro Se.
Nancy J. Crawford, Janice W.
McDaniel, Scott F. Weber, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT,
Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1956
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/30/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Terry
relief
on
Parks
his
42
appeals
U.S.C.
the
district
§ 1983
court’s
(2012)
order
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
denying
We
have
Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Parks v. Va.
Dep’t of Soc. Servs. Div. of Child Support Enf’t Servs., No.
1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2016).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?