Terry of the Family Parks v. The Commonwealth of Virginia


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999928442-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999995562]. Mailed to: Crawford, McDaniel, Parks, Weber. [16-1956]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/30/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1956 TERRY OF THE FAMILY PARKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB) Submitted: December 13, 2016 Decided: December 30, 2016 Before WILKINSON, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Parks, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy J. Crawford, Janice W. McDaniel, Scott F. Weber, DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1956 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/30/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Terry relief on Parks his 42 appeals U.S.C. the district § 1983 court’s (2012) order complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. denying We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Parks v. Va. Dep’t of Soc. Servs. Div. of Child Support Enf’t Servs., No. 1:16-cv-00568-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?