Ri'Cha ri Sancho v. Anderson School District Four


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01353-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000024847]. Mailed to: Ri'Cha ri Sancho. [16-1960]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1960 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1960 RI’CHA RI SANCHO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-01353-HMH) Submitted: January 30, 2017 Before DIAZ and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Circuit Decided: Judges, February 16, 2017 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ri’Cha ri Sancho, Appellant Pro Se. Allison Aiken Hanna, Mary Allison Caudell, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1960 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ri’Cha accepting ri the Sancho appeals recommendation the of district the court’s magistrate order judge and granting summary judgment to Anderson School District Four on her claims of a hostile work environment, disparate treatment, and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * HMH Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four, No. 8:15-cv-01353- (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that Sancho requests a payment plan for her mediation fee, Sancho should direct her request to the district court in the first instance. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?