Ri'Cha ri Sancho v. Anderson School District Four
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-01353-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000024847]. Mailed to: Ri'Cha ri Sancho. [16-1960]
Appeal: 16-1960
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/16/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1960
RI’CHA RI SANCHO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANDERSON SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:15-cv-01353-HMH)
Submitted:
January 30, 2017
Before DIAZ and
Circuit Judge.
HARRIS,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
February 16, 2017
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ri’Cha ri Sancho, Appellant Pro Se.
Allison Aiken Hanna, Mary
Allison Caudell, CHILDS & HALLIGAN, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1960
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/16/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ri’Cha
accepting
ri
the
Sancho
appeals
recommendation
the
of
district
the
court’s
magistrate
order
judge
and
granting summary judgment to Anderson School District Four on
her claims of a hostile work environment, disparate treatment,
and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17 (2012).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. *
HMH
Sancho v. Anderson Sch. Dist. Four, No. 8:15-cv-01353-
(D.S.C.
Aug.
3,
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
To the extent that Sancho requests a payment plan for her
mediation fee, Sancho should direct her request to the district
court in the first instance.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?