In re: Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--dismissing Motion for writ of habeas corpus (FRAP 21) filed by Petitioner Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit [999916011-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999927195-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999927191-2] Originating case number: Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999990520]. Mailed to: Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit. [16-1962]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1962 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1962 In re: OMAR ABDEL-AL-MUMIT, a/k/a John James Bell, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: December 8, 2016 Decided: December 20, 2016 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1962 Doc: 9 Filed: 12/20/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Omar Abdel-Al-Mumit filed a petition for an original writ of habeas This corpus court challenging ordinarily his declines South to Carolina entertain convictions. original habeas corpus petitions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Moreover, we find that the interest of justice would not be served by transferring the case to the district court. § 1631 (2012). See 28 U.S.C. Accordingly, we deny Abdel-Al-Mumit leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny his motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?