Joseph Crussiah v. Carol Attia


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for judicial notice [999999644-2]. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02516-PX. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015621]. Mailed to: Joseph Crussiah. [16-1967]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1967 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1967 JOSEPH CRUSSIAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROL ATTIA; ANTHONY MACARTHY; ASMIR SYED; LUC OKE; ANJANA DHAR, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02516-PX) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, Lucas William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1967 Doc: 24 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. the record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crussiah v. Attia, No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX (D. Md. July 26, 2016). We deny Crussiah’s motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?