Joseph Crussiah v. Carol Attia
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for judicial notice [999999644-2]. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02516-PX. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015621]. Mailed to: Joseph Crussiah. [16-1967]
Appeal: 16-1967
Doc: 24
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1967
JOSEPH CRUSSIAH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROL ATTIA; ANTHONY MACARTHY; ASMIR SYED; LUC OKE; ANJANA
DHAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02516-PX)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Nichole Nesbitt, Lucas
William Chrencik, GOODELL DEVRIES LEECH & DANN, LLP, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1967
Doc: 24
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Crussiah v. Attia,
No. 8:15-cv-02516-PX (D. Md. July 26, 2016).
We deny Crussiah’s
motion for judicial notice and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?