Die Blaise v. Sandra Harri


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999931025-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00023-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992660]. Mailed to: Die Blaise. [16-1968]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1968 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1968 DR. DIE K. BLAISE, Pharm. D, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DR. SANDRA HARRIS, Pharm. D.; VIBRA HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00023-REP) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Die K. Blaise, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1968 Doc: 15 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Die K. Blaise seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing part of his civil complaint with dismissing the remainder without prejudice. prejudice and Blaise has since filed an amended civil complaint raising the claims dismissed without prejudice, district court. and that action remains pending with the This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949). The order Blaise seeks to appeal is neither a final order an nor Accordingly, we appealable deny interlocutory leave to proceed or in collateral forma dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before order. pauperis and We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?