Die Blaise v. Sandra Harri

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999931025-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00023-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992660]. Mailed to: Die Blaise. [16-1968]

Appeal: 16-1968

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1968

DR. DIE K. BLAISE, Pharm. D,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. SANDRA HARRIS, Pharm. D.; VIBRA HOSPITAL OF RICHMOND,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:16-cv-00023-REP)

Submitted:

December 20, 2016

Decided:

December 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Die K. Blaise, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin D. Holden, JACKSON LEWIS
PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-1968

Doc: 15

Filed: 12/22/2016

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Die K. Blaise seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing

part

of

his

civil

complaint

with

dismissing the remainder without prejudice.

prejudice

and

Blaise has since

filed an amended civil complaint raising the claims dismissed
without

prejudice,

district court.

and

that

action

remains

pending

with

the

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order Blaise seeks to appeal is neither a final

order

an

nor

Accordingly,

we

appealable
deny

interlocutory

leave

to

proceed

or
in

collateral
forma

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

order.

pauperis

and

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2