Lisa Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US)
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999933465-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999933465-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00023-WMN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989400]. Mailed to: Lisa Krupczak. [16-1980]
Appeal: 16-1980
Doc: 18
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1980
LISA A. KRUPCZAK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DLA PIPER LLP (US); UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (1:16-cv-00023-WMN)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lisa A. Krupczak, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Evelyn Lewis, James
Patrick Ulwick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Scott
Michael Trager, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1980
Doc: 18
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa
A.
Krupczak
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss her civil action and
denying leave to amend her complaint.
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly,
we
grant
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
No.
1:16-cv-00023-WMN
Krupczak’s
motion
to
(D.
Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US),
Md.
appoint
July 27,
counsel
and
2016).
dispense
We
deny
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?