Lisa Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US)


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999933465-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999933465-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00023-WMN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989400]. Mailed to: Lisa Krupczak. [16-1980]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1980 Doc: 18 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1980 LISA A. KRUPCZAK, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. DLA PIPER LLP (US); UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00023-WMN) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisa A. Krupczak, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Evelyn Lewis, James Patrick Ulwick, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland; Scott Michael Trager, SEMMES, BOWEN & SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1980 Doc: 18 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lisa A. Krupczak appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss her civil action and denying leave to amend her complaint. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. No. 1:16-cv-00023-WMN Krupczak’s motion to (D. Krupczak v. DLA Piper LLP (US), Md. appoint July 27, counsel and 2016). dispense We deny with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?