Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Mary


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03196-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015835].. [16-1981]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-1981 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1981 RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:15-cv-03196-RWT) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se. Nigel F. Telman, Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-1981 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rungrudee Suteerachanon appeals the magistrate judge’s order awarding costs and attorney’s fees in favor of McDonald’s Restaurants court’s of Maryland, order Inc. granting (McDonald’s), McDonald’s and the to motion district dismiss Suteerachanon’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the appealed-from have reviewed orders. the record See and find Suteerachanon no v. reversible McDonald’s Restaurants of Md., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-03196-RWT (D. Md. July 15, 2016 & July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?