Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Mary
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03196-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015835].. [16-1981]
Appeal: 16-1981
Doc: 15
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1981
RUNGRUDEE SUTEERACHANON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:15-cv-03196-RWT)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se.
Nigel F. Telman,
Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex
Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-1981
Doc: 15
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rungrudee
Suteerachanon
appeals
the
magistrate
judge’s
order awarding costs and attorney’s fees in favor of McDonald’s
Restaurants
court’s
of
Maryland,
order
Inc.
granting
(McDonald’s),
McDonald’s
and
the
to
motion
district
dismiss
Suteerachanon’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought
pursuant
to
Title
VII
of
the
Civil
Rights
Act
of
1964,
as
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.
2016).
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the
appealed-from
have
reviewed
orders.
the
record
See
and
find
Suteerachanon
no
v.
reversible
McDonald’s
Restaurants of Md., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-03196-RWT (D. Md. July 15,
2016 & July 26, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?