Rungrudee Suteerachanon v. McDonald's Restaurants of Mary
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03196-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-1981]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
MCDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
January 31, 2017
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rungrudee Suteerachanon, Appellant Pro Se.
Nigel F. Telman,
Amanda C. Wiley, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Chicago, Illinois; Alex
Chad Weinstein, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
order awarding costs and attorney’s fees in favor of McDonald’s
Suteerachanon’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought
amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2008 & Supp.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the
Restaurants of Md., Inc., No. 8:15-cv-03196-RWT (D. Md. July 15,
2016 & July 26, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?