Candace Alston v. Experian Information Solutions
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03957-TDC. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Candace Alston. [16-2000]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
CANDACE E. ALSTON, an individual on behalf of themselves and
all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
NEIL F. LETREN, an individual on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
March 14, 2017
March 16, 2017
Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Candace E. Alston, Appellant Pro Se.
Meredith Campbell, Joy
Catherine Einstein, SHULMAN, ROGERS, GANDAL, PORDY & ECKER, PA,
Potomac, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
dismissing her claims against Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
Alston v. Experian Info. Sols., Inc., No. 8:14-cv-03957-
TDC (D. Md. Mar. 3, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?