Ronnie Alston v. Arastoo Yazdani


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [999979006-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02660-GJH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992670]. Mailed to: Ronnie Lee Alston; Larry D. McAfee. [16-2015]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2015 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2015 RONNIE LEE ALSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MD ARASTOO YAZDANI; DR. ARASTOO YAZDANI; DRS. ANTON MINASSIAN; DRS. SLAVKA MINASSIAN; MD RASHEED A. ABASSI; DORTHY KENMACIA, Pharmacist, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-02660-GJH) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Raymond Booth, Larry D. McAfee, GLEASON, FLYNN, EMIG & FOGLEMAN, CHARTERED, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2015 Doc: 20 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s order orders dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim and granting in part and denying in part his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. reasons stated by the district court. we affirm for the Alston v. Yazdani, No. 8:15-cv-02660-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2015; filed Aug. 5, 2016 & entered Aug. 8, 2016). response facts brief. and materials legal before We We deny Alston’s motion to strike a dispense with oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?