Ronnie Alston v. Arastoo Yazdani
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [999979006-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02660-GJH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992670]. Mailed to: Ronnie Lee Alston; Larry D. McAfee. [16-2015]
Appeal: 16-2015
Doc: 20
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2015
RONNIE LEE ALSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MD ARASTOO YAZDANI; DR. ARASTOO YAZDANI; DRS. ANTON
MINASSIAN; DRS. SLAVKA MINASSIAN; MD RASHEED A. ABASSI;
DORTHY KENMACIA, Pharmacist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:15-cv-02660-GJH)
Submitted:
December 20, 2016
Decided:
December 22, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant Pro Se.
Andrew Raymond Booth,
Larry D. McAfee, GLEASON, FLYNN, EMIG & FOGLEMAN, CHARTERED,
Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2015
Doc: 20
Filed: 12/22/2016
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s order orders
dismissing
his
complaint
for
failure
to
state
a
claim
and
granting in part and denying in part his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and
find
Accordingly,
no
reversible
error.
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
Alston v. Yazdani, No.
8:15-cv-02660-GJH (D. Md. Sept. 17, 2015; filed Aug. 5, 2016 &
entered Aug. 8, 2016).
response
facts
brief.
and
materials
legal
before
We
We deny Alston’s motion to strike a
dispense
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
because
presented
would
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?