Althea Marie Hughes v. Bank of America
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999938102-3] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00672-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Althea Marie Hughes P. O. Box 323 Prince George, VA 23875. [16-2026]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
ALTHEA MARIE HUGHES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
January 31, 2017
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Althea Marie Hughes, Appellant Pro Se.
Jr., SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia
Ronald James Guillot,
Beach, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Althea Marie Hughes seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
Because Hughes may be
able to remedy the deficiencies identified by the district court
support her claims, the order Hughes seeks to appeal is neither
Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, 807 F.3d 619, 623-
24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local
Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).
we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand the
case to the district court with instructions to allow Hughes to
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?