George Andrew Bratton v. State of North Carolina
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999963874-2] Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00021-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: George Andrew Bratton P. O. Box 232 Riverside, CA 92502. [16-2028]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE ANDREW BRATTON, an individual,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
THE ESTATE OF GEENA GEE BRATTON, Decedent,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, a Business Entity or Governmental
Agency; PAT MCCORY, Gov., an Individual; MECKLENBURG COUNTY
DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES, (DSS), a Business Entity or
Governmental Agency; PEGGY EAGAN, Director of DSS, an
individual; CHRIS TAYLOR, badge #211 in his individual and
official capacity of Lieutenant; MCDOWELL COUNTY SHERIFF
DEPARTMENT; CEDERBROOK RESIDENTIAL CENTER, a business
entity; THE ESTATE OF HENRY ROBERT BRATTON, JR., Deceased;
individual and in her official capacity; MCEWEN FUNERAL
SERVICE PINEVILLE CHAPEL CITY, a business entity; NORTH
CAROLINA ADOPTION AGENCY, a business entity or governmental
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:16-cv-00021-FL)
December 15, 2016
December 19, 2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Andrew Bratton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
George Andrew Bratton appeals the district court’s order
assign counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?