Nationwide Property & Casualty v. Howard Gosnell


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00071-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000024737].. [16-2030]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2030 Doc: 28 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2030 NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. HOWARD ANTONIA GOSNELL; GLENDA GRANTHAM GOSNELL; ROBIN GOSNELL LOGAN, Administrator of the Estate of Nancy Snow Gosnell, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00071-D) Submitted: February 9, 2017 Decided: February 16, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John N. Taylor, Jr., John C. Vermitsky, MORROW PORTER VERMITSKY FOWLER & TAYLOR PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellants. George L. Simpson, IV, SIMPSON LAW, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2030 Doc: 28 Filed: 02/16/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Howard Antonia Gosnell, Glenda Grantham Gosnell, and Robin Gosnell Logan appeal the district court’s order granting judgment on the pleadings for the Appellee on its complaint for a declaratory judgment regarding coverage for an accident caused by an underinsured motorist. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. Ins. Co. (E.D.N.C. v. Gosnell, Aug. 23, No. 2016). we for the Nationwide Prop. & Cas. 5:15-cv-00071-D, We affirm dispense 2016 with WL oral 4480959 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?