Nationwide Property & Casualty v. Howard Gosnell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00071-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000024737].. [16-2030]
Appeal: 16-2030
Doc: 28
Filed: 02/16/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2030
NATIONWIDE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
HOWARD ANTONIA GOSNELL; GLENDA GRANTHAM GOSNELL; ROBIN
GOSNELL LOGAN, Administrator of the Estate of Nancy Snow
Gosnell,
Defendants - Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Dever III,
Chief District Judge. (5:15-cv-00071-D)
Submitted:
February 9, 2017
Decided:
February 16, 2017
Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John N. Taylor, Jr., John C. Vermitsky, MORROW PORTER VERMITSKY
FOWLER & TAYLOR PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for
Appellants. George L. Simpson, IV, SIMPSON LAW, PLLC, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2030
Doc: 28
Filed: 02/16/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Howard Antonia Gosnell, Glenda Grantham Gosnell, and Robin
Gosnell
Logan
appeal
the
district
court’s
order
granting
judgment on the pleadings for the Appellee on its complaint for
a declaratory judgment regarding coverage for an accident caused
by an underinsured motorist.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
Ins.
Co.
(E.D.N.C.
v.
Gosnell,
Aug. 23,
No.
2016).
we
for
the
Nationwide Prop. & Cas.
5:15-cv-00071-D,
We
affirm
dispense
2016
with
WL
oral
4480959
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?