Khalilah Johnson v. UPS
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999934118-2]. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-04003-RDB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000029117]. Mailed to: Khalilah Johnson. [16-2045]
Appeal: 16-2045
Doc: 19
Filed: 02/23/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2045
KHALILAH JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD
UNION NO. 355,
OF
TEAMSTERS;
TEAMSTERS
LOCAL
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-04003-RDB)
Submitted:
February 17, 2017
Decided:
February 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Khalilah Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Jill Schultz Distler,
Emmett F. McGee, Jr., JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 16-2045
Doc: 19
Filed: 02/23/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-2045
Doc: 19
Filed: 02/23/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Khalilah
Johnson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
granting summary judgment to her employer on her retaliation
claim.
the
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
Appellant’s
brief.
See
4th
Cir.
R.
34(b).
Because
Johnson’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the
district
court’s
disposition,
review of the court’s order.
Johnson
has
forfeited
appellate
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc.,
370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, although we
grant Johnson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the
district
court’s
judgment.
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?