Philip Groggins v. Judy Robbin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion reverse decision on appeal [999988338-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999939238-2] Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00690-NKM,14-71033,15-07018 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015747]. Mailed to: P Groggins. [16-2047]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2047 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2047 PHILIP BUTLER GROGGINS, Debtor - Appellant, v. JUDY A. ROBBINS, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (7:15-cv-00690-NKM) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip Butler Groggins, Appellant Pro Se. William Joseph Alan Charboneau, OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Roanoke, Virginia; John Alfred Postulka, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2047 Doc: 21 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?