Philip Groggins v. Judy Robbin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion reverse decision on appeal [999988338-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999939238-2] Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00690-NKM,14-71033,15-07018 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015747]. Mailed to: P Groggins. [16-2047]
Appeal: 16-2047
Doc: 21
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2047
PHILIP BUTLER GROGGINS,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
JUDY A. ROBBINS,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, Senior District
Judge. (7:15-cv-00690-NKM)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip Butler Groggins, Appellant Pro Se.
William Joseph Alan
Charboneau, OFFICE OF THE U.S. TRUSTEE, Roanoke, Virginia; John
Alfred Postulka, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2047
Doc: 21
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Philip
Groggins
appeals
from
the
district
court’s
order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in
his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012).
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM (W.D. Va. Aug.
30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government
expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?