Linda L. Wagner v. Lindawagner.com

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00053-LMB-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000042467]. Mailed to: Linda L. Wagner 1624 Rachel's Retreat Circle Nashville, TN 37076. [16-2053]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2053 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/15/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2053 LINDA L. WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LINDAWAGNER.COM, an Internet domain name, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00053-LMB-IDD) Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 15, 2017 Before DUNCAN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linda L. Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Attison Leonard Barnes, III, Ari Scott Meltzer, David Edison Weslow, WILEY REIN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2053 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/15/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Linda L. Wagner appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the Internet domain name Lindawagner.com and denying reconsideration in Wagner’s in rem action under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d) (2012). We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the Accordingly, district court. Wagner v. Lindawagner.com, No. 1:16-cv-00053-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Aug. 15, 2016; Aug. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?