Stella Teku v. Loretta Lynch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-571-093 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-2058]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
STELLA ENGWARLI TEKU,
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: May 16, 2017
Decided: June 14, 2017
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald D. Richey, LAW OFFICE OF RONALD D. RICHEY, Rockville, Maryland, for
Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony P. Nicastro,
Assistant Director, S. Nicole Nardone, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Stella Engwarli Teku, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to reopen. We
have reviewed the administrative record and Teku’s claims, and conclude that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in denying her motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2016);
Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). * We further find Teku’s due
process claim to be without merit. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In re Teku (B.I.A. Aug. 18, 2016). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
To the extent Teku seeks to challenge the Board’s decision declining to reopen
her proceedings sua sponte, we lack jurisdiction to review that aspect of its decision.
Mosere, 552 F.3d at 400-01.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?