William Davis, Jr. v. W. Earl Britt
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000016303-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000000406-2], denying Motion for other relief [999994655-2], denying Motion for other relief [999994231-2], denying Motion for other relief [999978977-2], denying Motion for other relief [999971133-2], denying Motion for other relief [999968453-2], denying Motion for other relief [999959976-2], denying Motion for other relief [999953711-3], denying Motion for other relief [999952787-2]; denying Motion for leave to file [1000008680-2]; denying Motion to exceed length limitations [1000008680-3]; denying Motion to reconsider [999994235-2]; denying Motion to remand case [999993896-2], denying Motion to remand case [999977130-2], denying Motion to remand case [999966389-2], denying Motion to remand case [999953711-2] Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03211-CO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: William Scott Davis, Jr. [16-2062]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
W. EARL BRITT; JAMES C. FOX; JAMES C. DEVER, III; LOUISE W.
FLANAGAN; TERRENCE W. BOYLE; MALCOLM J. HOWARD; JAMES C.
GATES; REBECCA BEACH SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (5:16-ct-03211-CO)
February 23, 2017
February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
order dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his complaint
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous.
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Davis v. Britt, No. 5:16-ct-03211-CO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 2016).
We deny all of Davis’ pending motions, including his motions to
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?