Tiffany Snider-Jefferson v. Amigo Mobility International
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999963119-2]. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00406-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030075]. Mailed to: Tiffany Snider-Jefferson. [16-2064]
Appeal: 16-2064
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2064
TIFFANY SNIDER-JEFFERSON,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
AMIGO MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL,
Mobility, and/or Amigo,
INC.,
trading
as
Amigo
Defendant – Appellee,
and
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, trading as Wal-Mart, Inc., and/or
Wal-Mart,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Lawrence R. Leonard,
Magistrate Judge. (2:15-cv-00406-LRL)
Submitted:
February 17, 2017
Decided:
February 24, 2017
Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tiffany Snider-Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Bret Mitchell
Saunders, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; James
Appeal: 16-2064
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Willard Walker, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-2064
Doc: 9
Filed: 02/24/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Tiffany Snider-Jefferson appeals the district court’s order
granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing
her civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Snider-Jefferson
v.
Amigo
Mobility
Int’l,
2:15-cv-00406-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2016).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Inc.,
No.
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?