Tiffany Snider-Jefferson v. Amigo Mobility International


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999963119-2]. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00406-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000030075]. Mailed to: Tiffany Snider-Jefferson. [16-2064]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2064 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2064 TIFFANY SNIDER-JEFFERSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AMIGO MOBILITY INTERNATIONAL, Mobility, and/or Amigo, INC., trading as Amigo Defendant – Appellee, and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, trading as Wal-Mart, Inc., and/or Wal-Mart, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Lawrence R. Leonard, Magistrate Judge. (2:15-cv-00406-LRL) Submitted: February 17, 2017 Decided: February 24, 2017 Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tiffany Snider-Jefferson, Appellant Pro Se. Bret Mitchell Saunders, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; James Appeal: 16-2064 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Willard Walker, VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2064 Doc: 9 Filed: 02/24/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Tiffany Snider-Jefferson appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Snider-Jefferson v. Amigo Mobility Int’l, 2:15-cv-00406-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2016). oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before Inc., No. We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?