L. Ruther v. Barry Gash


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999943020-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000015649]. Mailed to: L. Ruther. [16-2068]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2068 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2068 L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BARRY GASH, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2068 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: L. Ruther appeals the district dismissing his civil action. find no reversible error. court’s order summarily We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Gash, No. 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19, 2016; entered Aug. 22, 2016). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?