L. Ruther v. Barry Gash

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999943020-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000015649]. Mailed to: L. Ruther. [16-2068]

Appeal: 16-2068

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2068

L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY GASH,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN)

Submitted:

January 31, 2017

Decided:

February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2068

Doc: 13

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
L.

Ruther

appeals

the

district

dismissing his civil action.
find no reversible error.

court’s

order

summarily

We have reviewed the record and

Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed

in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court.

Ruther v. Gash, No. 1:16-cv-01044-LO-MSN

(E.D. Va. filed Aug. 19, 2016; entered Aug. 22, 2016).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2