Michael Evans v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to compel [999975762-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999953751-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989582]. Mailed to: M Evans. [16-2072]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2072 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2072 MICHAEL SHAWN EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, and WARDEN PURDUE; CAPTAIN YOUNG, Security; SERBERT L. CUNNINGHAM, C/O; LIEUTENANT R. YARBER; BUREAU OF PRISONS, as individuals and in their official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT) Submitted: December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Shawn Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Carter Tison, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Appeal: 16-2072 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2072 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2016 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Michael Shawn Evans appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his Federal Tort Claims Act complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Evans v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 2, 2016). We We deny Evans’ motions to compel and to appoint counsel. dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?