Michael Evans v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to compel [999975762-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999953751-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999989582]. Mailed to: M Evans. [16-2072]
Appeal: 16-2072
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2072
MICHAEL SHAWN EVANS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
WARDEN
PURDUE;
CAPTAIN
YOUNG,
Security;
SERBERT
L.
CUNNINGHAM, C/O; LIEUTENANT R. YARBER; BUREAU OF PRISONS, as
individuals and in their official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT)
Submitted:
December 15, 2016
Decided:
December 19, 2016
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Shawn Evans, Appellant Pro Se.
Erin Carter Tison,
Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Appeal: 16-2072
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-2072
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2016
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael
Shawn
Evans
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief
on
his
Federal
Tort
Claims
Act
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
have
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Evans
v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00064-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 2,
2016).
We
We deny Evans’ motions to compel and to appoint counsel.
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?