L. Ruther v. Matt Bevin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999969329-2], [999943062-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000015671]. Mailed to: L. Ruther. [16-2073]
Appeal: 16-2073
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2073
L. RUTHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATT BEVIN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2073
Doc: 13
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
L.
Ruther
appeals
the
district
court’s
dismissing his incomprehensible civil action.
the record and find no reversible error.
order
summarily
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we deny
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Ruther v. Bevin, No.
1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016).
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?