L. Ruther v. Matt Bevin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999969329-2], [999943062-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000015671]. Mailed to: L. Ruther. [16-2073]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2073 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2073 L. RUTHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MATT BEVIN, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2073 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: L. Ruther appeals the district court’s dismissing his incomprehensible civil action. the record and find no reversible error. order summarily We have reviewed Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Ruther v. Bevin, No. 1:16-cv-01045-LO-MSN (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral contentions argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?