Armando Zulveta v. TC Unlimited Inc


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999950177-2] Originating case number: 6:15-cv-02880-HMH-KFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999992594]. Mailed to: appellant. [16-2078]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2078 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 1 of 4 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2078 ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TC UNLIMITED INC; TIM CASE, Defendants – Appellees, and STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; PHILPOT LAW FIRM PA; STEADMAN HAWKINS CLINIC OF THE CAROLINAS; WILSON JONES CARTER & BAXLEY PA; ROBERT P. RESTREPO, JR.; STEPHEN R. BRUNER; IRVIN H. PHILPOT, III; CURTIS ELLIOT; WESLEY J. SHULL, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (6:15-cv-02880-HMH-KFM) Submitted: December 20, 2016 Decided: December 22, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WYNN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 16-2078 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 2 of 4 Armando Despaigne Zulveta, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Alan Domin, CLAWSON & STAUBES, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2078 Doc: 16 Filed: 12/22/2016 Pg: 3 of 4 PER CURIAM: Armando Despaigne Zulveta appeals scheduling order in his civil action. the district court’s This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Zulveta seeks nor to appeal interlocutory is or neither collateral a final order order. an appealable Additionally, although Zulveta seeks to appeal the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate motion to judge’s file a default judgment, claims against dismissed recommendations late and answer, to several Zulveta’s to to grant grant deny interlocutory Defendants’ Zulveta’s motions Defendants, two to this appeal of dismiss court those motion for Zulveta’s previously orders for lack of jurisdiction, Zulveta v. State Auto. Mut. Ins., No. 152561, 2016 WL 4394543, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 18, 2016), and another appeal would be not only interlocutory but duplicative. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. oral argument because the facts 3 and legal We dispense with contentions are Appeal: 16-2078 Doc: 16 adequately Filed: 12/22/2016 presented in the Pg: 4 of 4 materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?