In re: Ajamu Osborne

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999934350-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cr-00155-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000005316]. Mailed to: A Osborne. [16-2092]

Appeal: 16-2092

Doc: 8

Filed: 01/18/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2092

In Re:

AJAMU SAWANDI OSBORNE,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:12-cr-00155-1)

Submitted:

December 22, 2016

Decided:

January 18, 2017

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2092

Doc: 8

Filed: 01/18/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ajamu Sawandi Osborne petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his “application for out of time reconsideration and review of a
sentence

imposed

in

violation

of

records

accuracy

laws

and

constitution,” which Osborne filed while his direct appeal was
pending.

He

seeks

an

order

from

this

court

directing

the

district court to act.

Because there is no longer a pending

action

court,

in

the

district

we

conclude

record does not reveal any undue delay.
the mandamus petition.

that

the

present

Accordingly, we deny

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

2