In re: Ajamu Osborne
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999934350-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cr-00155-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: A Osborne. [16-2092]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
AJAMU SAWANDI OSBORNE,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
December 22, 2016
January 18, 2017
Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ajamu Sawandi Osborne, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Ajamu Sawandi Osborne petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his “application for out of time reconsideration and review of a
constitution,” which Osborne filed while his direct appeal was
district court to act.
Because there is no longer a pending
record does not reveal any undue delay.
the mandamus petition.
Accordingly, we deny
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?