Crystal Brown v. Carolyn Colvin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:15-cv-00320-KDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015737]. Mailed to: C Brown. [16-2098]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2098 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2098 CRYSTAL WEAVER BROWN, for KMM and KMM, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Administration, Commissioner of the Social Security Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Kaymani Daniels West, Magistrate Judge. (5:15-cv-00320-KDW) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Crystal Weaver Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Quinn E.N. Doggett, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2098 Doc: 11 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Crystal Weaver Brown appeals the magistrate judge’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Brown’s application for supplemental security income on behalf of her minor son. * have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Colvin, No. 5:15-cv-00320-KDW (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to the jurisdiction magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012). 2 of the

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?