US v. Eugene Milford

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-02009-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000018428].. [16-2110]

Appeal: 16-2110

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/07/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2110

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EUGENE MILFORD,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard M. Gergel, District
Judge. (2:15-cv-02009-RMG)

Submitted:

January 27, 2017

Decided:

February 7, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Milford, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2110

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/07/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Eugene Milford appeals the district court’s order granting
the Government’s motion for attorney’s fees.
the record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed

Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Milford,

No.

19,

2016).

dispense

with

facts

and

legal

materials

before

contentions

2:15-cv-02009-RMG

are

oral

argument

adequately

(D.S.C.

Sept.

because

the

presented

in

the

We

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2