Kevin Robertson v. US


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01109-JFM,14-10434. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015708]. Mailed to: Kavitha Bondada; Kevin Robertson. [16-2123]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2123 KEVIN ROBERTSON, Debtor - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND, Creditors – Appellees, and MARK J. FRIEDMAN; U.S. TRUSTEE-BALTIMORE, II, Trustees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01109-JFM; 14-10434) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Ciamporcero Avetta, Kavitha Bondada, Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael Joseph Salem, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellees. Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2123 Doc: 18 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. States, dispense No. 1:16-cv-01109-JFM with contentions are oral argument adequately (D. Md. because presented in Robertson v. United Sept. the the 14, 2016). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?