Kevin Robertson v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01109-JFM,14-10434. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015708]. Mailed to: Kavitha Bondada; Kevin Robertson. [16-2123]
Appeal: 16-2123
Doc: 18
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2123
KEVIN ROBERTSON,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND,
Creditors – Appellees,
and
MARK J. FRIEDMAN; U.S. TRUSTEE-BALTIMORE, II,
Trustees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:16-cv-01109-JFM; 14-10434)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se.
Julie Ciamporcero Avetta,
Kavitha Bondada, Bruce R. Ellisen, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Michael Joseph Salem, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
OF
MARYLAND,
Annapolis,
Maryland,
for
Appellees.
Appeal: 16-2123
Doc: 18
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 16-2123
Doc: 18
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
Robertson
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying his motion to
reopen his prior Chapter 7 proceeding.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
States,
dispense
No.
1:16-cv-01109-JFM
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
(D.
Md.
because
presented
in
Robertson v. United
Sept.
the
the
14,
2016).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?