In re: Mohammad Mohammad-Omar
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999940208-2] as moot. Originating case numbers: 1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3,1:10-cv-01112-CMH. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000049263]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [16-2137]
Appeal: 16-2137
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/27/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2137
In re:
MOHAMMAD ASHRAF MOHAMMAD-OMAR,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3; 1:10-cv-01112-CMH)
Submitted:
March 9, 2017
Decided:
March 27, 2017
Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammad Ashraf Mohammad-Omar, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2137
Doc: 11
Filed: 03/27/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mohammad
Ashraf
Mohammad-Omar
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, motion to correct clerical
errors, and motion for judgment on the pleadings, following the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act.
Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
denied these three motions by order dated February 24, 2017.
Accordingly,
because
the
district
court
has
recently
decided
Mohammad-Omar’s pending motions, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?