John Stritzinger v. VEC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999975430-2] Originating case number: 5:16-mc-00021-KS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015698]. Mailed to: J Stritzinger. [16-2150]
Appeal: 16-2150
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2150
JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
VEC,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:16-mc-00021-KS)
Submitted:
January 31, 2017
Decided:
February 2, 2017
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2150
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/02/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John
dismissing
S.
Stritzinger
his
court order.
complaint
appeals
because
the
he
district
failed
to
court’s
comply
order
with
a
We have reviewed the record and find that this
appeal is frivolous.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court.
(E.D.N.C.
July
27,
Stritzinger v. VEC, No. 5:16-mc-00021-KS
2016).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?