Eric Sanders v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [1000049102-2], denying Motion for other relief [999993289-2]; denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [999999818-2]; denying Motion to supplement [999999817-2]. Originating case number: 0:15-cv-02313-JMC-PJG Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000054362]. [16-2151]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2151 Doc: 21 Filed: 04/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2151 ERIC ALAN SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, Defendant - Appellee, and EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, of Charlotte, NC; JOHN HAYWARD; MIKE CALZAREETA; DOUG FORD; RAYVON IRBY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (0:15-cv-02313-JMC-PJG) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 16-2151 Doc: 21 Filed: 04/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Eric Alan Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Celeste T. Jones, Richard James Morgan, MCNAIR LAW FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2151 Doc: 21 Filed: 04/03/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Eric Alan Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order overruling his objections to the magistrate judge’s order compelling him to respond to the Defendant’s discovery requests. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Sanders seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sanders’ motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?