Michael Moore v. Michael Morgan
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00244-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000054228]. Mailed to: Michael Moore and Jolee Wortham. [16-2170]
Appeal: 16-2170
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2170
MICHAEL LAMONT MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL MORGAN; ANDREW WHITLEY; MELISSA BISETTE; ROBERT
EVANS; BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC; WILSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE;
SHERIFF CALVIN WOODARD, Sheriff, Wilson County; DERRICK CREECH,
City Councilmen; SUSAN K. FARFOUR; CARDINAL GROUP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00244-FL)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 3, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Marc Presel, Jolee M. Wortham,
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2170
Doc: 9
Filed: 04/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Lamont Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v.
Morgan, No. 5:16-cv-00244-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2016).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?