Michael Moore v. Michael Morgan

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:16-cv-00244-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000054228]. Mailed to: Michael Moore and Jolee Wortham. [16-2170]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2170 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2170 MICHAEL LAMONT MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MICHAEL MORGAN; ANDREW WHITLEY; MELISSA BISETTE; ROBERT EVANS; BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC; WILSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE; SHERIFF CALVIN WOODARD, Sheriff, Wilson County; DERRICK CREECH, City Councilmen; SUSAN K. FARFOUR; CARDINAL GROUP, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:16-cv-00244-FL) Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017 Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Lamont Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Marc Presel, Jolee M. Wortham, BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2170 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Lamont Moore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Morgan, No. 5:16-cv-00244-FL (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?