In re: Vivek Shah


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999946210-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999954793-2]; terminating Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999994566-2]; granting Motion to withdraw [1000004684-2] Originating case number: 5:15-cv-07542 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026765].. [16-2171]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2171 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2171 In re: VIVEK SHAH, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:15-cv-07542) Submitted: February 16, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Decided: DUNCAN, February 21, 2017 Circuit Judge, and Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vivek Shah, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2171 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/21/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) directing present court. motion. record seeks district the He court to does not reveal an order from act. We conclude undue delay court that the the district Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. to in this withdraw his amended petition. We grant Shah’s motion We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?