In re: Vivek Shah
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999946210-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999954793-2]; terminating Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999994566-2]; granting Motion to withdraw [1000004684-2] Originating case number: 5:15-cv-07542 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000026765].. [16-2171]
Appeal: 16-2171
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2171
In re:
VIVEK SHAH,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(No. 5:15-cv-07542)
Submitted:
February 16, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge,
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Decided:
DUNCAN,
February 21, 2017
Circuit
Judge,
and
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vivek Shah, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2171
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/21/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that
the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255
(2012)
directing
present
court.
motion.
record
seeks
district
the
He
court
to
does
not
reveal
an
order
from
act.
We
conclude
undue
delay
court
that
the
the
district
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.
to
in
this
withdraw
his
amended
petition.
We grant Shah’s motion
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?