Walter Trujillo-Portillo v. Loretta E. Lynch
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A200-886-612 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-2172]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WALTER TRUJILLO-PORTILLO, a/k/a Jual Del Trujillo-Walter,
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: March 28, 2017
Decided: April 12, 2017
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen C. Fleming, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN C. FLEMING, State College,
Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, John
S. Hogan, Assistant Director, David H. Wetmore, Office of Immigration Litigation,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Walter Trujillo-Portillo, a native and citizen of Guatemala and a citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing
his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his motion for a continuance
and finding that he abandoned his application for cancellation of removal.
reviewing the record and the transcript of the proceedings, we conclude that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Trujillo-Portillo’s appeal.
See Lendo v.
Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007) (stating that denial of continuance is
reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?