Burl Anderson Howell v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for summary disposition (Local Rule 27(f)) [999955755-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00898-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Howell. [16-2184]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
BURL ANDERSON HOWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-cv-00898-F)
January 5, 2017
January 9, 2017
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam
Burl Anderson Howell, Appellant Pro Se.
John Stuart Bruce,
Acting United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Burl Anderson Howell appeals the district court’s September
28, 2016 order denying his post-judgment motion as moot.
also seeks to appeal the district court’s November 24, 2015 and
February 29, 2016 orders dismissing his civil action for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction and denying reconsideration.
Howell previously appealed, and we previously affirmed, the
district court’s November 24, 2015 and February 29, 2016 orders.
See Howell v. United States, No. 16-1220, 2016 WL 4363146 (4th
Cir. Aug. 16, 2016).
To the extent that Howell again seeks to
appeal these or any earlier orders of the district court, we
dismiss the appeal as untimely.
As for the district court’s
September 28, 2016 order denying his post-judgment motion as
moot, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Howell’s pending motion and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
See Howell v. United
States, No. 5:14-cv-00898-F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED IN PART;
AFFIRMED IN PART
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?