John Carrington v. Steven Mnuchin


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-03422-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000112838]. Mailed to: Steven Mnuchin. [16-2190]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2190 Doc: 55 Filed: 07/06/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2190 JOHN C. CARRINGTON; DEBORAH T. CARRINGTON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. IMB HOLDCO LLC; ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Defendants - Appellees, and STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:13-cv-03422-JMC) Submitted: June 29, 2017 Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: July 6, 2017 Appeal: 16-2190 Doc: 55 Filed: 07/06/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 John Thomas Irick, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN THOMAS IRICK, Washington, DC, for Appellants. Rik S. Tozzi, Richard Carlton Keller, BURR & FORMAN LLP, Birmingham, Alabama, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2190 Doc: 55 Filed: 07/06/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: John C. Carrington and Deborah T. Carrington appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend its order denying their Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from its order dismissing their civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carrington v. Mnuchin, No. 5:13-cv-03422-JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 14, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?