Barry Bluefeld v. Barry Cohen

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to strike [999979270-2]; and denying Motion to impose sanctions [999979270-3] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-02857-PX Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000031016].. [16-2207]

Appeal: 16-2207

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/27/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2207

BARRY J. BLUEFELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARRY S. COHEN; JOEL S. MEISEL; DAVID H. COHEN,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv02857-PX)

Submitted:

February 23, 2017

Decided:

February 27, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry J. Bluefeld, Appellant Pro Se.
Matthew D. Matkov, SALTZ
MATKOV PC, Wayne, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2207

Doc: 20

Filed: 02/27/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Barry
order

J.

Bluefeld

granting

correspondence.

the

seeks

to

Defendants’

appeal
motion

the
to

district

court’s

strike

certain

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order Bluefeld seeks to appeal is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we deny the Appellees’ motions to strike and for
sanctions, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2