Annette Cummings v. NLRB
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999958329-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999986971-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00216-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000031018]. Mailed to: Annette Cummings. [16-2208]
Appeal: 16-2208
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/27/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2208
ANNETTE CUMMINGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:16-cv-00216-RDB)
Submitted:
February 23, 2017
Decided:
February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annette Cummings, Appellant Pro Se. Helene Debra Lerner, Aaron
David Samsel, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Washington, D.C.,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 16-2208
Doc: 30
Filed: 02/27/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Annette Cummings sought judicial review of a decision by the
General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board.
that
it
did
prosecutorial
not
have
decisions
subject
of
matter
the
Board’s
district court dismissed the action.
jurisdiction
General
Finding
to
review
Counsel,
the
Cummings appeals this order
and a subsequent order denying reconsideration.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Cummings v. NLRB,
No. 1:16-cv-00216-RDB (D. Md. June 28, 2016; Oct. 20, 2016).
We
grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny her
motion for discovery.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?