William Davis, Jr. v. Department of State

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [1000013049-2]; denying Motion to remand case [1000005914-2], denying Motion to remand case [999993899-2]; denying Motion to vacate [1000000443-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999972370-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999964993-2] Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00058-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015650]. Mailed to: William Davis, Peter Teumer.. [16-2233]

Appeal: 16-2233

Doc: 49

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2233

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; WAKE COUNTY NORTH
MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT; TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA,

CAROLINA

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00058-RBS-DEM)

Submitted:

January 31, 2017

Decided:

February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
George Maralan
Kelley,
III,
Assistant
United
States
Attorney,
Norfolk,
Virginia; Peter Andrew Teumer, ROBEY TEUMER & DRASH, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellees.

Appeal: 16-2233

Doc: 49

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-2233

Doc: 49

Filed: 02/02/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
William

Scott

Davis,

Jr.,

appeals

the

district

court’s

order dismissing his Freedom of Information Act complaint and
imposing upon him a prefiling review system for future civil
actions.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Davis v. Dep’t of State, No. 4:13-cv-00058-RBS-

DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2016).

We deny all of Davis’ pending

motions, including his motions to remand, to vacate, to appoint
counsel, and to appoint a guardian ad litem.
oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with
contentions
this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3