William Davis, Jr. v. Department of State


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to consolidate case (Local Rule 12(b)) [1000013049-2]; denying Motion to remand case [1000005914-2], denying Motion to remand case [999993899-2]; denying Motion to vacate [1000000443-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999972370-2]; denying Motion for other relief [999964993-2] Originating case number: 4:13-cv-00058-RBS-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000015650]. Mailed to: William Davis, Peter Teumer.. [16-2233]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2233 Doc: 49 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2233 WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE; SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants - Appellees, and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; WAKE COUNTY NORTH MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT; TOWN OF CARY NORTH CAROLINA, CAROLINA Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:13-cv-00058-RBS-DEM) Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Peter Andrew Teumer, ROBEY TEUMER & DRASH, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Appeal: 16-2233 Doc: 49 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 16-2233 Doc: 49 Filed: 02/02/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Freedom of Information Act complaint and imposing upon him a prefiling review system for future civil actions. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Dep’t of State, No. 4:13-cv-00058-RBS- DEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2016). We deny all of Davis’ pending motions, including his motions to remand, to vacate, to appoint counsel, and to appoint a guardian ad litem. oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials legal before We dispense with contentions this court are and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?