Nicole McCrea v. The Johns Hopkins University
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999977175-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00579-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Nicole Rena McCrea 5205 East Capitol Street SE Washington, DC 20019. [16-2240]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
NICOLE RENA MCCREA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY; DEXTER SMITH; EILEEN HAASE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00579-JKB)
Submitted: March 30, 2017
Decided: April 3, 2017
Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicole Rena McCrea, Appellant Pro Se. Elena D. Marcuss, Adam Thomas Simons,
MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Nicole Rena McCrea appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her
complaint asserting claims under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000d – 2000d-7 (2012); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C.
§§ 1681–1688 (2012); Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794
(2012); Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131–
12165 (2012); and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985 (2012). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. McCrea v. The Johns
Hopkins Univ., No. 1:15-cv-00579-JKB (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?