Adam L. Perry v. William Britt


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999974864-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999974154-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00037-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000031026]. Mailed to: Perry. [16-2262]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2262 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/27/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2262 ADAM L. PERRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM EARL BRITT, Federal Eastern District Judge at Wake County in his Official Capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (2:15-cv-00037-D) Submitted: February 23, 2017 Decided: February 27, 2017 Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Adam L. Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Michael Anderson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2262 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/27/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Adam L. Perry appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing jurisdiction his civil or, action for alternatively, lack failure of to subject state a matter claim on which relief could be granted, denying his motion to strike, and denying as moot his motion to lift a stay of discovery. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in Perry’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Perry’s informal brief does not challenge with specific argument the district court’s rulings, Perry has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we grant Perry’s applications seeking appeal district leave to court’s judgment. in forma We pauperis dispense and with affirm oral the argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?