Marlow Bates, Sr. v. Apple, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999977962-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00929-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Marlow L. Bates, Sr. [16-2278]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARLOW L. BATES, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-00929-JFM)
Submitted: March 28, 2017
Decided: March 31, 2017
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Will C. Autz, New York, New York, David R.
Eberhart, San Francisco, California, Rachel S. Janger, O’MELVENY & MYERS, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Marlow L. Bates, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his copyright
infringement suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Bates v. Apple, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-00929-JFM (D. Md.
Oct. 13, 2016). We deny Bates’ motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?