CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to supplement [999979487-2]; granting Motion to strike [1000037806-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [999966043-2]; denying Motion to expedite decision [1000309441-3]; denying Motion to remove case from abeyance [1000309441-2]. Originating case number: 8:16-cv-01459-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000328116]. Mailed to: Montgomery Sibley. [16-2305]

Appeal: 16-2305

Doc: 35

Filed: 07/12/2018

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2305

CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC.,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY,
Defendant - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD W. BLACK; LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.; JOSHUA B. WAXMAN,
Third Party Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-01459-RWT)

Submitted: June 29, 2018

Decided: July 12, 2018

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Montgomery B. Sibley, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Bresnahan, Adam Joel Singer,
VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Washington, D.C.; Steven E. Kaplan, Joshua

Appeal: 16-2305

Doc: 35

Filed: 07/12/2018

Pg: 2 of 3

B. Waxman, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 16-2305

Doc: 35

Filed: 07/12/2018

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Montgomery B. Sibley appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’
motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for
summary judgment.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

CarMax Auto

Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley, No. 8:16-cv-01459-RWT (D. Md. July 13, 2016; filed Oct. 14,
2016 & entered Oct. 17, 2016). We further grant CarMax’s motions to supplement the
record and to strike, grant Sibley leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny as moot
Sibley’s motion to expedite and to remove this case from abeyance. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3