Gary Washington v. South Carolina Community Bank
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00128-CMC,14-05589-dd Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [16-2307]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In re: GARY ALLEN WASHINGTON; MICHELLE ANNE WASHINGTON,
-----------------------------GARY ALLEN WASHINGTON; MICHELLE ANNE WASHINGTON,
Debtors - Appellants,
SOUTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY
Creditors - Appellees,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00128-CMC)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pg: 2 of 3
Alexander B. Wathen, Houston, Texas, for Appellants. Ramona D. Elliott, Deputy
Director/General Counsel, P. Matthew Sutko, Associate General Counsel, Wendy Cox,
Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.;
Judy A. Robbins, United States Trustee, John Timothy Stack, Assistant United States
Trustee, Linda Barr, Trial Attorney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Columbia, South Carolina; Carmen V. Ganjehsani, RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN &
ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Travis Emil Menk, BROCK & SCOTT,
PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Gary Allen Washington and Michelle Anne Washington appeal from the district
court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying their second motion for
reconsideration of the order granting relief from the automatic stay, denying their request
for an extension of time to amend and confirm their plan of reorganization, and
dismissing their Chapter 11 bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record provided on
appeal and the arguments of the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Washington v. South Carolina Comm.
Bank, No. 3:16-cv-00128-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 2016). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?