In re: Samuel Jacob
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999969097-2] Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00149-MSD-TEM-1,4:15-cv-00056-MSD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Samuel Jacobs. [16-2319]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In re: SAMUEL B. JACOBS,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:10-cr-00149-MSD-TEM-1;
January 17, 2017
January 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel B. Jacobs, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Samuel B. Jacobs petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging
the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.
directing the district court to act.
Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the § 2255
motion on December 6, 2016.
Accordingly, because the district
court has recently decided Jacobs’ motion, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?