In re: Samuel Jacob


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999969097-2] Originating case number: 4:10-cr-00149-MSD-TEM-1,4:15-cv-00056-MSD. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000006260]. Mailed to: Samuel Jacobs. [16-2319]

Download PDF
Appeal: 16-2319 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-2319 In re: SAMUEL B. JACOBS, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:10-cr-00149-MSD-TEM-1; 4:15-cv-00056-MSD) Submitted: January 17, 2017 Decided: January 19, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel B. Jacobs, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 16-2319 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Samuel B. Jacobs petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an directing the district court to act. order from this court Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied the § 2255 motion on December 6, 2016. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Jacobs’ motion, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?