Donald Ragavage v. City of Wilmington
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00085-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . [16-2361]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DONALD L. RAGAVAGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CITY OF WILMINGTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00085-FL)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: June 5, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas A. Woodley, Megan K. Mechak, WOODLEY & MCGILLIVARY LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Scott C. Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL,
HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Donald Ragavage appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
for the Appellee on Ragavage’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims based on his termination
because Ragavage was not disciplined or terminated by an official with final
policymaking authority. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ragavage v. City of
Wilmington, No. 7:15-cv-00085-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?