Donald Ragavage v. City of Wilmington

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:15-cv-00085-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000094031]. [16-2361]

Appeal: 16-2361

Doc: 24

Filed: 06/05/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2361

DONALD L. RAGAVAGE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF WILMINGTON,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00085-FL)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Decided: June 5, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas A. Woodley, Megan K. Mechak, WOODLEY & MCGILLIVARY LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Scott C. Hart, SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL,
HICKS & HART, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 16-2361

Doc: 24

Filed: 06/05/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Donald Ragavage appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
for the Appellee on Ragavage’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) claims based on his termination
because Ragavage was not disciplined or terminated by an official with final
policymaking authority. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ragavage v. City of
Wilmington, No. 7:15-cv-00085-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2016). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2