Annette Cummings v. International Union Security
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999993817-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999991273-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999991271-2]; granting Motion to extend filing time [999997934-2]; denying Motion to strike [1000004582-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01868-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Annette Cummings Apt H 6902 Brightway Place Gwynn Oak, MD 21207. [16-2369]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
INTERNATIONAL UNION SECURITY POLICE AND FIRE PROFESSIONALS OF
AMERICA (SPFPA), LOCAL 555; DARIO MARQUEZ, CEO, MVM Inc.;
GORDON GREGORY, Esq., Gregory, Moore, Jeakle & Brooks, PC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
February 23, 2017
February 27, 2017
Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annette Cummings, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Jacob Clark, GREGORY,
MOORE, JEAKLE & BROOKS, P.C., Detroit, Michigan; Peter Joshua Leff,
MOONEY, GREEN, SAINDON, MURPHY & WELCH, PC, Washington, D.C.; Jason
Matthew Branciforte, Brandon Robert Mita, LITTLER MENDELSON PC,
Washington, D.C.; for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
dismissing her complaint alleging breach of employment contract
and violations of the National Labor Relations Act.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Int’l Union Sec. Police & Fire Prof’ls of Am., No. 1:16-cv-01868RDB (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2016).
We grant Cummings leave to proceed in
forma pauperis on appeal, grant Appellees’ motion to extend time
to file the informal response brief, and deny Cummings’ motion to
strike the informal response brief. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?